A lot of those types of apartment buildings in my area (and i assume other places in Belgium as well) don't have a "building housenumber", only the individual flat housenumbers.
Making a node for every single flat just looks bad on the map. And I agree that it just makes more sense to put it on the one node/way. On Sat, Aug 22, 2020, 11:53 Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Aug 22, 2020, 11:43 by [email protected]: > > On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 at 17:25, Thibault Molleman < > [email protected]> wrote: > > So what's the consensus on an apartment building (way) that has mailboxes > for each person who has an apartment there. > I've just been tagging those as: > addr:housenumber = A1;A2;A3;A4;A5;A6;A7;A8;A9;A10;A11 > > > Could you use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:flats? Leaving > unit/apartment/flat numbers out of the addr:housenumber. > > It depends - are there actually separate house numbers assigned to each > apartment? > (yes, it happens - similarly to some places that assigned house numbers > to every single > house, shed and separate address for every single door of a garage) > > Or is there a house number (assigned to building or building complex) and > separate > unit/apartment/flat number? In such case addr:housenumber = > A1;A2;A3;A4;A5;A6;A7;A8;A9;A10;A11 > would be misuse of the tag. > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
