There are a lot of big power towers that carry an optical communications line together with the power lines. Would that be utility=power;communication?
Adding specific implied information is not wrong, but data consumers shouldn't rely on them. If someone changes utility=power to utility=communication;power, or if someone outright deletes the utility tag, that power pole is still correctly tagged. Janko ned, 20. ruj 2020. u 20:30 Paul Johnson <[email protected]> napisao je: > > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 11:58 AM Joseph Eisenberg < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> The previous responses are focusing on the benefit of adding >> explicit tags in situations where the current tagging is ambiguous. >> >> Certainly there is a benefit of adding "oneway=no" on all two-way roads >> and "oneway=yes" on motorways to make the situation explicit. >> >> But the original question was about whether or not we should add >> "man_made=utility_pole" + "utility=power" to current power poles. >> > > Well, does narrow it down from a neighborhood pole that might have cable > television or carry the PSTN. > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
