We always use it on nodes to mark a crossing where you must dismount. Not very common on ways around here.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 11:22 AM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < [email protected]> wrote: > I always understood > highway=crossing + bicycle=no > tagging to mean "you cannot use this crossing to cross road while cycling, > it does not affect legality of cycling on the road" > > Used when > (1) cycleway or footway with allowed cycling is interrupted by > crossing where cyclists are obligated to dismount > (2) there is cycleway/footway with allowed cycling on both sides of > road, it is tagged as cycleway:left/cycleway:right/cycleway:both > and there is pedestrian only crossing at some point > (cyclist cannot switch sides without dismounting) > > Or is it a tagging that means "you must dismount while either > using crossing and while cycling on the road", > making this basically useless. > > I am asking as there was discussion on OSM Wiki between me > and one other person, with recent edits to OSM Wiki that seems > to misrepresent real tagging practice. > > I am considering reverting them, but I wanted to ask here whatever > what I think about tagging practice matches what other consider > as consensus. > > See > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:highway%3Dcrossing&action=history > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dcrossing#highway.3Dcrossing_with_bicycle.3Dno > for OSM Wiki links > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
