Oct 18, 2020, 10:20 by tagging@openstreetmap.org: > > >>>>> Imagine I would add hgv=no or motorcycle=no tags to >>>>> pedestrian crossings >>>>> >>>> Is there a case where hgv use sidewalk together with >>>> pedestrians and cross road using crossing shared with a >>>> pedestrians? >>>> >>>> Is there a case of sidewalk where hgv are allowed but on >>>> crossing with road oneis supposed to walk carrying your vehicle? >>>> >>>> Is there some existing usage of hgv=noon crossings? >>>> >>> >>> Valid questions, but the exact same questions apply for a >>> pedestrian way crossing a secondary. On that pedestrian way >>> cyclists are not allowed so what is the use of adding bicycle=no >>> to the crossing node? >>> >>> >> I agree that adding bicycle=no on highway=crossing is pointless on >> footways with bicycle=no or >> where bicycle=no is implied >> >> It is useful solely if cyclists are allowed on cycleway/footway >> crossing road and are obligated to >> dismount if crossing road at that point >> > > It would be good if all crossings that require this special handling can > be found searching for bicycle=no + highway=crossing but that is not > possible as the overwhelming majority are cases of pointless tagging. > > It is possible to narrow them to find just ones attached to way with highway=cycleway or footways with bicycle=yes/bicycle=designated (using overpass API) > For these abnormal cases cyclist are never obliged to dismount at the > point of the crossing but from one side of the road to the other side of > the road so tagging that part of the way separately is more precise. > > > > >> (and yes, in most cases, though not all, it can be retagged as access >> tagging on way) >> > > > > > Can you give an example? > > cycleway:both=lane road with crossing for pedestrians only (I am giving this example to you for a third time)
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
