That is clear and unambiguous terminology that is not religion-specific. I would support this.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020, 2:10 PM António Madeira via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > In many modern places near cemeteries there's not a room, but several. > So, I would prefer amenity=place_of_mourning > > > Às 12:39 de 05/11/2020, Peter Elderson escreveu: > > > >> rate the following "favourable", "acceptable" or "unfavourable"? >> >> amenity=mourning >> > > acceptable, though I think an amenity should be a feature, not an activity > > >> amenity=place_of_mourning >> > > favourable. Secondary tags could add details if necessary > > >> amenity=mourning_room >> > > unfavourable. Too specific. > > >> amenity=viewing_arrangements >> > > unfavourable. I think an amenity should describe a feature, not > arrangements. > > >> amenity=deceased_viewing >> > > unfavourable. > > >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing > listTagging@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
