2020-11-08, sk, 19:54 Joseph Eisenberg rašė: > The reason is that at mid zoom levels there is far too much data > in the database for it all to be made available in a vector tile > format so that the map is fully customizable.
Unless we will do a real generalisation which would mean we will start doing cartography! Which is where all this thread started ;-) As for open source software stack. The only feature which is missing is to cache layers separately (where "layer" is buildings, water, landuse, places, could be two different versions of say landuse etc.) and then combine them dynamically to final vector tile pbf on the fly depending on the request. With postgis introducing vector tile generation on the database side I think we will not have to wait long for a lot of vector tile servers to pop-up. Client side: mapbox has done almost nothing with regards to cartography in the last two years (and is still lacking support for non abstract patterns, so things like wetlands look like crap), but harpgl is gaining and you can always use openlayers which would be not as sexy (fast), but for example you would have high quality text (compared to webgl text). _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
