You can suggest not complaining in such case by creating a JOSM issue: see instructions at https://josm.openstreetmap.de/newticket
Nov 9, 2020, 21:50 by [email protected]: > I’ve added those tags. JOSM still complains but if it fits the power line > schema better I guess having some editor warnings is okay. > > Thank you! > >> On Nov 9, 2020, at 11:25 AM, Hidde Wieringa <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> You could use "line_management=transition" (and according to the wiki also >> "location:transition=yes"). See for more examples the wiki >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aline_management%3Dtransition with >> similar entries as the photo you posted. >> >> Whether this suppresses the warning in JOSM, I do not know. >> >> Kind regards, >> Hidde >> >> >> >> On 09-11-2020 18:40, Tod Fitch wrote: >> >>> There are a number of places where an above ground power line transitions >>> to below ground. I am not equipped to guess where the line runs once it >>> goes below ground so I stop mapping at the last power pole. However the >>> validation in JOSM flags this with a warning and I hate warnings on my >>> edits. Is there some tag to put on the last power pole to indicate this is >>> not an issue? I don’t see tagging for this situation described in the wiki. >>> >>> See >>> https://cloud.fitchfamily.org/index.php/s/k23qn2ERyqo4a3w >>> for an example of this. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
