Nov 21, 2020, 17:43 by [email protected]: >> rock „pieces“ would be tagged as „stone“ I guess? >> > > Not so sure about that, then it would be surface=stones, (note the plural) > wouldn't it? > I am completely fine with both versions. I created today https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Drock where I described surface=rock as fitting for them - but feel free to change this > - Rock implies a rough naturalness > +1 > - Steps made of large (single-piece) hewn stone columns would be called > 'stone steps' > so surface=stone (surface=stones) would be more fitting for them? > - Bare [rock] implies the lack of rubble on top > Small amount: yes Complete lack of it: no. See for example https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Krywan_podejscie.jpg Especially for easily eroding rock that is breaking piece by piece some rubble will be always present. > - Scree is specially loose > +1 > - Personally I think bare_rock and stone are synonyms here, unless someone > thinks there's a difference. > Yes, even if we would invent some differences none would be present in de facto usage (different areas with different differences and subtle distinctions) > rock = rough natural stone, could be loose stones too > stone = smooth stone / bare rock, could be hewn > bare_rock = probably similar to stone, definitely no loose stones > scree = surface like (large) gravel, natural > rocky = scree is rocky, piles of differently sized rocks are rocky > Overall I think that I am fine with surface=rock, but I am not opposed to also other values (though I am not going to make proposals or wiki pages for them)
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
