On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 22:35, Graeme Fitzpatrick <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 22:24, Paul Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Here is a videoabout a bridleway. Which is also a footpath (by legal >> definition). In fact, >> it's also a Byway Open to All Traffic (BOAT). Most of the time it's the >> ONLY way to visit Foulnes Island. It's also the most dangerous >> path in Britain. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mM7C_Pw7OL8 >> > > & which we do indeed have mapped: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158785097#map=14/51.5857/0.9244 > And which somebody edited 2 hours ago (as I write this). I suspect that person read my previous mail or saw the video. Which then goes back to the discussions we were having a while back about > tagging the "dangerousness" of tracks. > Indeed it does. Quicksand. Tide. Unexploded ordnance. Maybe drop bears, too. Yes, it's marked as being a ford, tidal=yes, & visibility=no, which > suggests it's not the spot for a Sunday afternoon stroll, but it's also > marked as foot, horse, bicycle, car & motorbike=yes, which then suggests it > can't be too bad after all? > That's legal access, not sane access. You are legally permitted to drive any legal road vehicle on it, but you would be crazy to do so. > > The basic facts given in that video could be included as a description, > but shouldn't we have some sort of "danger" classification? > When we've figured out the tagging for dangers. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
