Following on from comments made in regard to deprecating both emergency= & amenity=coast_guard & replacing them with military=coast_guard:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 02:01, Brian M. Sperlongano <zelonew...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is probably a US-centric viewpoint, but I note that there is a > general lack of tagging under the military= key to indicate the military > branch associated with a military base. For example, we have > military=naval_base, but no equivalent tagging for army, air force, > amphibious, (dare I say space force?) bases. In places where the coast > guard IS part of the military, tagging it under landuse=military + > military=* is appropriate. However, I also support the need to tag coast > guard areas in places where they are considered non-military and thus > landuse=military would not be appropriate. > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 04:18, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > yes, a documented way to distinguish "finer" details are missing not only > for military branches, the same holds true for police branches and other > law enforcement and border / tax etc. control. > I have just posted a new proposal re Military Bases: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Military_bases Please have a read & comment either here or on the discussion page. Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
