On 12.12.20 14:25, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 5:25 AM Jan Michel
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,
where do you see a problem here? The current situation might not be
perfect, but it is usable as it is. The only thing to keep in mind is
that the number of "lanes" does not need to match the number of entries
in the "XY:lanes" tags.
That disagrees with literally every lane editing and validation tool in
existence at this time.
Please check for example this way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406235586
It perfectly validates in all tools I tried - JOSM, OSMI, Keepright...
Rendering in the lane attribute style in JOSM is fine as well.
Even the examples in the Wiki show exactly this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes#Crossing_with_a_designated_lane_for_bicycles
It was mentioned in the original proposal for the :lanes suffix 8 years ago.
So, it *agrees* "with literally every lane editing and validation tool
in existence" as well as documentation.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
