My main point got lost: the proposal should explain how the mapping of pumps in pumping stations should be handled, short of using indoor mapping, especially as your cover photo shows an indoors pump in an industrial building.
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020, 00:40 Brian M. Sperlongano, <zelonew...@gmail.com> wrote: > François, thank you for your hard work on this proposal! I will most > likely support this version. I have a few questions: > > 1. The proposal states "It is proposed to discourage the use of > undocumented pump:type=* to state pump mechanisms in favour of new > pump_mechanism=*." It is not clear what is meant by "discourage" in this > context. Given the other threads today regarding reservoirs, it is > important to communicate clearly what we mean when we propose to stop using > a tag. I would ask that instead of "discourage", that the proposal should > explicitly say "deprecate" so that there is no confusion that you intend > for us to stop using pump:type and document it as deprecated in the > deprecated features list. Otherwise, I would ask that you clearly and > explicitly state what you mean by "discourage" and where those words of > discouragement would go. > > 2. You propose to deprecate man_made=pumping_rig and propose to replace > it with the (far more popular) man_made=petroleum_well. Both of these are > combined with the substance=* key. I would ask whether there are usages of > pumping_rig that are being used with substance=* tags for non-petroleum > products (i.e. not oil/natural gas) which would be lost by abandoning this > pumping_rig? If the answer is "yes", then I would support simply changing > the description of pumping_rig to explicitly exclude petroleum products, > and if the answer is "no" then I agree with deprecating it. > > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 1:48 PM François Lacombe < > fl.infosrese...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> Following some rework to take care of comments received during the first >> voting round of pumping proposal, here is a second proposed version >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Pumping_proposal >> >> IanVG and I spent time to improve wording and make rationale section >> clearer. >> Classification of pumps is now done with pump_mechanism and is still >> equivalent to which available on Wikipedia. Numerous references are made >> toward it. >> >> Additional examples and illustrating gifs have been added at the bottom >> as well. >> >> This message opens a second RFC period and is expected to be shorter. >> Vote could begin by next Saturday. >> >> Best regards >> >> François >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
