I'll gladly answer questions, but I think you need to rephrase. I
suppose it is some hidden critique in there, but I honestly do not
understand the question. It would be better for me if you put words on
the critique instead of wrapping it in a question.
I think it's fairly obvious that if the common method to tie together
several separate entities that has a single name is to make a single
multipolygon-relation with several outers, there should also be a
relation for a single named entity with multiple natural types. It can't
be a multipolygon, so it must be something else.
Naming single entity natural features split into several sub-types is
currently not a supported feature by OSM, although it is very hard to
get people to actually say that (some do on this list, some don't). And
after that it's very hard to get a statement if this missing feature is
desirable to implement, or if OSM is not the place for this type of
detailed geo data.
I find that you are one of those that are very mysterious about what you
actually think ;-), but seems to strive for status quo, so I assume that
you think that the thing I need here is already supported sufficiently
well, but I don't know, as you haven't said.
/Anders
On 2020-12-13 20:37, Christoph Hormann wrote:
Anders Torger <[email protected]> hat am 13.12.2020 20:08 geschrieben:
[...] I think to actually have them all
tied together in a unit is still a good idea, [...]
That does not answer my question.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
