The proposal currently states: > Meaning of the unisex <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:unisex>=yes > is currently unclear: > > - gender neutral facility (as the "unisex" term in English); or > - facility that accessible for men and women, either segregated or not. > > I do not understand what is unclear. The term unisex is well understood among English speakers to mean "gender neutral". Unisex never refers to a gender segregated facility. A tag gender=unisex meaning "gender neutral" would be perfectly clear. gender=mixed would probably be understood, but "mixed gender" is not a commonly used phrase so it would probably have more potential for mis-interpretation. gender=neutral would probably be more widely understood, but again, I don't see the issue with gender=unisex.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 4:16 AM martianfreeloader < [email protected]> wrote: > That's already in use in the same proposal. > > gender=any - all genders allowed, unknown if there is segregation > gender=segregated - all genders allowed, genders segregated > gender=unisex - all genders allowed, no gender segregation > > I was wondering if we can replace gender=unisex by something which has > the same meaning. Currently, gender=mixed is used instead. > > > On 06/10/2022 00:42, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > gender=any? > > > > Thanks > > > > Graeme > > > > > > On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 at 21:21, martianfreeloader > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > > > > In the discussion of the Gender proposal, I noted that I find it > > strange > > to use the term "unisex" for "gender-neutral" or "all-gender" (as sex > > and gender are different properties). > > > > Proposal: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Gender > > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Gender> > > > > My suggestion was to use gender=mixed instead of gender=unisex. > > However, > > the question was raised whether the meaning of gender=mixed is still > > easily understood if the feature can only be used by one person at > the > > time. I think the answer is yes. But if people disagree, it would be > > great if they raise their concerns before voting starts. > > > > Any comments? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
