sent from a phone > On 11 Oct 2022, at 13:30, Davidoskky via Tagging <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > wrote: > > This is problematic, since if you only tag amenity=fountain it will fall back > to a decorative fountain since amenity=fountain appears to be defined in that > way. those fountains that supply drinking water have the drinking_water=yes tag. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
- Re: [Tagging] offlist about for Marc_marc
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - More sensible values for f... Davidoskky via Tagging
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - More sensible values for founta... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - More sensible values for f... Marc_marc
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - More sensible values for f... Davidoskky via Tagging
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - More sensible values f... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - More sensible values f... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - More sensible valu... Davidoskky via Tagging
- [Tagging] offlist Re: RFC - More ... Marc_marc
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - More sensible ... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - More sensible ... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - More sens... Davidoskky via Tagging
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - More ... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - More sensible ... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - More sens... Warin
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - More ... Davidoskky via Tagging
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - More sens... Davidoskky via Tagging
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - More ... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - More ... Warin
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - More ... Martin Koppenhoefer