Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> writes: > Am Mi., 12. Okt. 2022 um 16:25 Uhr schrieb Greg Troxel <[email protected]>: > >> Part of the issue is that landuse should more or less follow property >> lines, unless there is some reason why not. > >> a several-acre parcel with >> a house and some trees is still landuse=residential on all of it, > > it depends, if this means a big residential garden or other use that is > clearly associable with the people living there, then yes, if there are > other significant uses (particularly commercially relevant uses) like > breeding animals, growing fruit or vegetables for sale (significantly more > than the residents use themselves), or some other workplace, the landuse > could be split, it is up to the discreetion of the mapper.
I agree that if there is commercial use also, then there are likely going to be two landuses. That's what I tried to say earlier. But most residential properties are not like that. Around me there are often 0.5 ha to several ha (1 to 5 or maybe 10 acres, for US people :-) parcels that have a house, some lawn, and some either wetland or forest, where in the wetland or forest, pretty much nothing happens other than plants grow and wildlife wanders. I see that as fitting into the larger residential landuse as it's basically buffer from neighbors. I also think the point someone made earlier is valid: landuse is not just about buildings.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
