I'll second that, Brian. What you outline could be a nice template for (similarly-profiled) proposals going forward. I know that's a taller hill to climb, I do. More of us can both talk about and do such things, so, yeah. Challenges are good, especially when more mutually suggested, like this one. But no rush, we're simply talking about it. Noticing it. Pointing it out. Agreeing it / something like it are a good idea to push forward, because this sort of deliberateness to craft really works, and we can do this sometimes, making us and our data better and smarter; good growth.
Somewhere around feedback (loop?) re editor presets / how we might improve tagging in or out of editor(s). We should have our hands around that. Really, it is bolstering data with feedback while making stronger, in good ways. These are mighty planks we build. On Jun 28, 2024, at 12:23 PM, Brian M. Sperlongano <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it would be worthwhile to examine where that slow increase is coming > from in order to understand what the current state of editor support is. I > would like to see this proposal spell out what the current status is of both > tags in all major editors so we fully understand the state of play and who is > using the old tags and why. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
