crossing:markings=yes is useful for the frequent cases that the markings do not correspond to any of your editors presets (frequent here in Italy)
On Sat, 10 May 2025, 14:40 Peter Elderson, <[email protected]> wrote: > LS > I voted against this proposal. It has merits, but also some aspects I > don't support, such as the unnecessary deprecation; the suggestion to use > crossing=uncontrolled where many zebra crossings are controlled crossings; > and the promotion of the lame tag crossing:markings=yes which should be > crossing:markings=<markings>. > It's a package deal, so if one thing is not acceptable for me, I can only > vote against the whole package. > > Peter Elderson > > > Op vr 9 mei 2025 om 23:08 schreef bauer33333--- via Tagging < > [email protected]>: > >> Dear mailing list, >> >> Voting has started for "Deprecate crossing=zebra in favor of >> crossing:markings". >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Deprecate_crossing%3Dzebra_in_favor_of_crossing:markings >> As there have been significant changes to the proposal since the start of >> the RFC I encourage you to read it again before voting. >> >> Bauer33333 >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
