James Strachan wrote:
> I was going to go ahead and port the xsl library to the new pipeline model
> as a demonstration but I think I'll hold off until I've mailed the new http
> tag library first - I've a feeling we may be doing similar things at the
> same time.
James,
Agree. Take a look at my last email. Let's have a last round of negotiation,
and as you suggest let's apply to both http and xsl as demonstrations of the model
(if you need help I can take the xsl tag).
Once armed with solid use cases, I think we'll be in good shape for a final :-) formal
proposal...
[iotransformer is interesting in that I'll probably break it up to provide
point "datasource" tags... more on it later...]
-- Pierre
- Re: PROPOSAL: tag pipelining Pierre Delisle
- RE: PROPOSAL: tag pipelining Ignacio J. Ortega
- Re: PROPOSAL: tag pipelining James Strachan
- Re: PROPOSAL: tag pipelining Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart
- Re: PROPOSAL: tag pipelining James Strachan
- Re: PROPOSAL: tag pipelining Pierre Delisle
- Re: PROPOSAL: tag pipelining James Strachan
- Re: PROPOSAL: tag pipelining Pierre Delisle
- Re: PROPOSAL: tag pipelining Pierre Delisle
- Re: PROPOSAL: tag pipelining James Strachan
- Re: PROPOSAL: tag pipelining Pierre Delisle
- Re: PROPOSAL: tag pipelining James Strachan
- Re: PROPOSAL: tag pipelining Joseph B. Ottinger
- Re: PROPOSAL: tag pipelining James Strachan
- Re: PROPOSAL: tag pipelining Pierre Delisle
- Re: PROPOSAL: tag pipelining Joseph B. Ottinger
- Re: PROPOSAL: tag pipelining James Strachan
- Re: PROPOSAL: tag pipelining Pierre Delisle
- Re: PROPOSAL: tag pipelining James Strachan
