I agree; seems to make sense. +1.
Shawn
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Rich Catlett wrote:
> +1 I think this sounds like a great idea.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Rich Catlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Confuscious say "Man who stand |
> Programmer | on toilet, high on pot!" |
> | |
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
>
> > Hola Dan:
> >
> > >
> > > Since tool support seems to be an area of growing interest among tag
> > > library users, I'd like to suggest we add a "tools" directory to the
> > > repository, and within that directory we could have an "UltraDev"
> > > directory for something like CTLX, and a GoLive directory when someone
> > > creates a similar tool for GoLive, etc. If there is any issue
> > > with this,
> > > please let me know.
> > >
> >
> > +1, seems truly logical, only a comment: better to put the Ultradev
> > version somwhere on the path , as "Tools/ultradev_4" or a
> > "tools/ultradev/4.0" or something like that, it's likely that we will
> > need to do that when a new version of ultradev comes to live, and the
> > same is true for any other tool we add to our ( short ) actual tools
> > collection.
> >
> > Saludos ,
> > Ignacio J. Ortega
