I know this is probably in the docs, but I'm in a rush at the moment. Can
anyone on the mailing list vote or do you have to be a developer? If my
vote counts then,
for adding the log taglib to CVS
+1
- Todd Chaffee
At 04:54 PM 04/30/01 +0100, you wrote:
> > I'd be interested in seeing them as part of the project. If they are
> > useful the flaws will be eliminated - that's the beauty of open source.
>If
> > they aren't useful they can eventually be removed. I'm always in favor of
> > more choices and I'm sure I could use at least the logging tags.
>
>I agree - I'd particularly find the log tags useful. They are a natural fit
>with Shawns benchmarking tags too..
>
>They are documented here:-
>
>http://www.epesh.com/logtags.jsp
>
>So we could do things like
>
><log:info category="foo.bar">
> <benchmark:duration>
> do some stuff here...
> </benchmark:duration>
></log:info>
>
>I'd be happy to help maintain and extend them too.
>
>Already log4j is a Jakarta project and it supports a variety of output
>destinations such as files, JMS or SMTP. Also logging can be enabled and
>disabled per on individual categories dynamically - so this taglib would
>solve my logging needs today.
>
>I'm sure in the future we can extend this, such as providing a standard web
>app for configuring or viewing log4j. Or providing hooks for additional
>'logging providers' such as things like buffering up log messages in memory
>then sending them out in blocks or whatever.
>
>So I'd like to call a vote to add the log taglib to CVS...
>
>+1
>
>If we get enough votes I'd be happy to setup the 'Jakarta-style' Ant build
>process and check it into CVS.
>
>James
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
