Hi Bay,
Sorry I had overlooked your emails on the same topic.
[We *definitely* need to improve our process :-).]
You made some interesting suggestions on a previous
email (which I went back to read, and included below).
Since you seem to have some good ideas on how
the web site could be improved, how about
a formal proposal on what you feel we should do.
[Much easier for others to give feedback on
clear, formal proposals]
Thanks,
-- Pierre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> As I've got a taglib lost in the submission process, I'm more than happy
> to second this :)
>
> Also to repeat a suggestion from before of a webpage containing
> submissions. Or a running-email.
>
> Bay
>
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Pierre Delisle wrote:
>
> > For example, on July 23, Richard Friedman has submitted
> > a printing taglib for review. I have not yet seen any comment
> > on the list on its suitability for jakarta-taglibs.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Being in the same waiting for a reply on a submission position, maybe
> there could be a list somewhere of pending taglibs? Or submitted taglibs.
> Or a similar email to the current maintainer email. Basically a list of
> submitted taglibs, urls, that goes around.
>
> Then as an 'official' taglib person is allocated/volunteers to check the
> submissions, they can be specified next to it.
>
> Because of the modular aspect of the Taglib project, I think there's far
> more room for independent new submissions than in many projects.
>
> Something else that would be very useful is some enhancements to the
> current instructions (http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs/addtaglib.html).
> It details well the process after a tag has been reviewed, but what would
> be of most help when submitting something. Can a submitter document the
> taglib in a standard way? The existing taglib documentation seems to have
> a common, but inconsistent theme. Which is right?
>
> Another question, if I release a new update to a submitted taglib, do you
> want to be bothered about that.
>
> I figure it's all about feedback, open-source projects are in such an
> interesting position with customers at all levels. From the end-user,
> through developers, to submitters and then you lot.
>
> *waffle off*
>
> Bay
