On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 04:09, Vianen, Jeroen van wrote: > 1. What is going to be the standpoint of Apache regarding these external > Bouncy Castle JARs for signing and/or encrypting mail and how are these > going to be integrated in the (automated) build?
That's something I'm not worried about yet - as much it's on the repository and is not being build automatically, I guess we're fine. > 2. The license in the generated JAR is still version 1.1, rather than 2.0. Ok, I will fix that later (Apache already provides some scripts for that task) []s, Felipe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
