On 7/10/05, Felipe Leme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oops, forgot my votes... > > > Felipe Leme wrote: > > > [X] +1 - merge Jakarta Taglibs Project into this new project
+1, but slightly different in that we should move taglibs individually over to the new project rather than the whole lot. We should only move active ones over at first, and then later ones that are dormant (but still have good reason to exist). > > 1.Jakarta Standard Taglibs should be a project of its own, given the +1, subproject of Jakarta > > 2.What about the other taglibs? Should we migrate them as is to the new > > > 2.2 [X] leave them behind (on a read-only SVN access, with the latest > > releases, etc..) and let's create new ones from scratch - that would > > > 2.2.1 Last releases > > > > [X] +1 release a final version for each existing taglib (and a 1.0 for > > those never released) before "closing the doors" -0. Don't see why they need to have a final taglibs release, provided the versions in the new subproject follow the same contract etc. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
