+6 (one each ;).

--
Martin Cooper


On 8/4/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> This has been discussed before, but its time for some book-keeping. I
> would like to call a VOTE for declaring the following Taglibs as
> deprecated. The reasons, in each case, are (probably in the order of
> importance):
> 
> 1) Much of the functionality provided by these Taglibs is now available
> via JSTL
> 2) There are no immediate plans (that I am aware of) for any dev activity
> for these Taglibs projects
> 3) There has been little dev activity for these Taglibs projects over the
> last year
> 
> For the votes that pass, the respective Taglibs will be listed as
> deprecated on the Taglibs website. Ofcourse, the versioned releases will
> continue to be available, but there will be no nightlies (Glenn has
> already removed these from the nightlies last week).
> 
> VOTE (A) - Application Taglib:
> [ ] +1 - Yes, please deprecate
> [ ] +0 - I'm OK with this
> [ ] -0 - Maybe we shouldn't (please specify reasons)
> [ ] -1 - We definitely shouldn't (please specify reasons)
> 
> VOTE (B) - DBTags Taglib:
> [ ] +1 - Yes, please deprecate
> [ ] +0 - I'm OK with this
> [ ] -0 - Maybe we shouldn't (please specify reasons)
> [ ] -1 - We definitely shouldn't (please specify reasons)
> 
> VOTE (C) - Page Taglib:
> [ ] +1 - Yes, please deprecate
> [ ] +0 - I'm OK with this
> [ ] -0 - Maybe we shouldn't (please specify reasons)
> [ ] -1 - We definitely shouldn't (please specify reasons)
> 
> VOTE (D) - Request Taglib:
> [ ] +1 - Yes, please deprecate
> [ ] +0 - I'm OK with this
> [ ] -0 - Maybe we shouldn't (please specify reasons)
> [ ] -1 - We definitely shouldn't (please specify reasons)
> 
> VOTE (E) - Response Taglib:
> [ ] +1 - Yes, please deprecate
> [ ] +0 - I'm OK with this
> [ ] -0 - Maybe we shouldn't (please specify reasons)
> [ ] -1 - We definitely shouldn't (please specify reasons)
> 
> VOTE (F) - Session Taglib:
> [ ] +1 - Yes, please deprecate
> [ ] +0 - I'm OK with this
> [ ] -0 - Maybe we shouldn't (please specify reasons)
> [ ] -1 - We definitely shouldn't (please specify reasons)
> 
> I'm +1 to deprecating all six. Not to take anything away from the utility
> they provided in their heyday.
> 
> -Rahul
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to