On 9/15/05, Felipe Leme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rahul, > > AFAIK, we are all developers for all taglibs, so please feel free to > apply the patches yourself without review if you are confident to do so. <snip/>
Just broadcasting my intent to see if anyone has anything insightful to say ;-) > > Of course, a peer review would be nice, but giving the current status of > the project, I wouldn't count on that. In fact, I have the feeling that > the even the Standard taglibs are going to be dormant, as JSTL 1.2 is > now being developed at Glassfish (I just realized it these days - we > have not talked about it on the list and I guess Sun just opted for this > path as Glassfish is open-source and our project is dormant)... > <snap/> And indeed, you had quite some insight. Given the above, I'll just leave things where they are in Jakarta Taglibs Standard land. On 9/16/05, Felipe Leme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Henri Yandell wrote: > > > Hmm. So maybe we shouldn't be moving Standard to subproject level, > > maybe we should just be planning to put Standard into dormancy. > > Haven't thought about that, but it could be an option. Anyway, I think > we should ask the JSTL EG group about its plan first - I don't like the > way Sun has silently hijacked JSTL to Glassfish (*), so let's not do the > same. <snap/> Definitely. Felipe, would you like to initiate that conversation with the JSTL EG (you might be best equipped to do that)? We're also going to have to revisit the decision about Standard's future. -Rahul > > -- Felipe > > * although I don't blame them, given the current status of our project > and to the fact that technically speaking the JSTL RI was the JWSDP, and > not the Jakarta Taglibs itself. Besides, now that JSTL will be part of > Java EE, it makes sense for the JSTL RI be the Java EE RI, as it was the > case for the Servlet and JSP RIs. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
