On 5/16/07, Karl von Randow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote: > Had a vague memory it might be - but always best to bid low as such > and force activity :) Sounds like one to look at including in > Unstandard. By merging the small taglibs together I think we can get > enough overlap to increase activity. Great. Yeah, that sounds reasonable. So once the chaff is cut from the taglibs project, what "is" unstandard?
It's the things that would be in JSTL if it was an open source project and not tied to a spec.
Is it just a bundle of what's left? I imagine that the intention is that the tag libraries would still have separate URIs and thus separate prefixes when in use, so "unstandard" is just a brand that we put on the collection of tag libraries and presumably they can all be downloaded together as one jar.
I guess so. JSTL has multiple tag libraries; so it would make sense to do the same here. Ideally we will have libraries that match the JSTL libraries, and extra ones. What's currently in Unstandard would probably be something for 'core' etc, but we would still have a 'log' one.
Is "unstandard" the best name for what this is? I'm not sure if that's the final name or just a place-holder. It feels pejorative and cheeky/quirky at the same time; I like the later and dislike the former so I raise it as a potential discussion issue. Perhaps once we see clearly what might be included in the package it would be a better time to revisit it.
Probably not the best name. It was a cheeky/quirky thing I kicked off when JSTL came out based on things that new JSTL users were asking for. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
