Ceki G�lc� wrote:
>
> Hi James,
>
> At 14:50 13.07.2001 +0100, James Strachan wrote:
> >Hi Ceki
> >
> >> From: Ceki G�lc� [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>
> >> FYI, Jochen Hiller has written logs tags based on log4j. The code seems
> >> pretty complete but I am not necessarily a good judge. I have also
> >> noticed his code resides under the org.apache.log4j.taglib namespace
> >> which hints that the code may be distributed along with standard log4j
> >> distribution, i.e. log4j.jar.
> >>
> >> As far as I know, there are now 3 logging taglibs based on
> >> log4j.
> >
> >
> >Actually the log taglib in jakarta-taglibs started life as Joseph Ottinger's
> >logging taglib - which may be one of the 3 you are thinking of.
> >Joe donated his taglib to the taglibs project some time back.
>
> If I understand correctly, http://www.adjacency.org/logtags.jsp is
> no longer pertinent...
>
> >> Considering competition is good then there is nothing wrong
> >> with this state of affairs. However, this also means that there is
> >> wasted development effort.
> >
> >Agreed.
> >
> >If Jochen merges his work with the log taglib in jakarata taglibs (which
> >seems likely) then we'll have only one.
> >
> >
> >> How about closer coopreation between the taglibs project and
> >> and the log4j project? Do you think we could work together to
> >> incorporate jakarta-taglib's log tag in log4j? I welcome your
> >> suggestions and comments.
> >
> >
> >I think the jakarta-taglib project is a better place for the log taglib
> >since it is a taglib. e.g. it can share work on common build formats,
> >generation of HTML documentation and JSP 1.1, 1.2 TLDs and so on.
>
> Whatever you deem most appropriate is fine with me. IMHO,
> pre-packaging log taglib in log4j will give the former a serious
> boost. This may seem like a silly marketing detail but it can make
> a real difference for the log taglib. Regards, Ceki
>
And vice versa.
Due to the surrounding infrastructure, the log taglib can reside
in jakarta-taglibs. But there is no reason joint releases can't be
done. log4j could include the latest release of the log taglib,
the log taglib could contain the latest release of log4j.
This way both projects are doing the marketing. :-)
Regards,
Glenn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /* Spelin donut madder |
MOREnet System Programming | * if iz ina coment. |
Missouri Research and Education Network | */ |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
