On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Kishi Mikio wrote:
> But, because expression language is available in "only" JSTL, > it is inconvenience. Also, expression language has some problems. The nightly build of the String taglib ought to work in an EL environment. I can add the same feature to the Log taglib's nightly build. Would be interesting to hear which taglibs you'd want EL-ized. > So, I have considered the use of not "EL-based JSTL" but "RT-based JSTL" > in "all JSP parts" . > Has it made a mistake in this strategy ? [Have?] I don't think so. You're just using the JSTL in the same style as all taglibs have been used before. Nothing wrong there. > Is it better to use "EL-based JSTL" ? I think it's an architectual rather than technical decision. JSP 2.0 will be EL-ised by default [as far as I know] so by using the EL-based JSTL now you might get better forward compatibility. Then again, turning off the EL is just a config option in the web.xml so it won't be very hard. [I'm slowly putting together the JSP 2.0 world in my mind, so I may be way off] Hen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
