Let's wait until bugzilla is back - I don't remember the details of that bug; maybe we could re-open it anyway (if it's not really a problem with the specification).
Felipe
Kris Schneider wrote:
A couple of other points to consider. According to the Serialization Spec, adding Serializable to a class is a compatible change. In addition, a serializable class must have access to the no-arg constructor of its first nonserializable superclass. Since ResultImpl extends Object, it meets that requirement as well.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
