On Wednesday 04 February 2009 02:21:29 pm Shawn Willden wrote:
> In fact, based on some testing with tractable values of q, it appears that
> an attacker who searches the right 25% of the keyspace has a 50% chance of
> finding the key.
An obvious followup -- this means that the key size is effectively reduced by
about two bits. As long as there are no other problems, and I can't see what
they could be, a 94-bit key strength is obviously more than adequate.
Shawn.
_______________________________________________
tahoe-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://allmydata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
