On Friday 12 June 2009 11:23:06 am Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote:
> It is a solution to a slightly different problem, though -- even if we
> have a good end-user-oriented installer integrated into Tahoe proper,
> we still want it to be easy and portable to build from source.
Agreed. Both are needed. Binary builds are more important for Windows than
for *nix (and more important for OS X than for other *nixes) because of the
relative likelihood that a compiler toolchain etc., is installed. But in any
case, both binary distributions and good source buildability are important.
Shawn.
_______________________________________________
tahoe-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://allmydata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
