Hi, You have to take into consideration that certain repos are not complete. So for example on one of my lenny boxes I'm actually pointing to etch because no packages were available for lenny. Or on a jaunty I am pointing on hardy. It's cool that it works but you should take that into account in your stats if it ponders the efforts into building debs.
Anyone trying to get the packages into the official distributions ? or a PPA for ubuntu ? Arthur On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Zooko O'Whielacronx <[email protected]>wrote: > ARCH is i386 dapper 4 edgy 1 etch 84 feisty 4 gutsy 17 hardy 159 > intrepid 8 jaunty 2 lenny 6 sid 3 stable 0 testing 0 unstable 0 > ARCH is amd64 dapper 0 edgy 0 etch 10 feisty 1 gutsy 0 hardy 23 > intrepid 3 jaunty 1 lenny 7 sid 0 stable 0 testing 0 unstable 0 > ARCH is powerpc dapper 0 edgy 0 etch 0 feisty 0 gutsy 2 hardy 0 > intrepid 0 jaunty 0 lenny 0 sid 0 stable 0 testing 0 unstable 0 > ARCH is arm dapper 0 edgy 0 etch 0 feisty 0 gutsy 0 hardy 0 > intrepid 0 jaunty 0 lenny 1 sid 0 stable 0 testing 0 unstable 0 > ARCH is solaris dapper 0 edgy 0 etch 0 feisty 0 gutsy 0 hardy 1 > intrepid 0 jaunty 0 lenny 0 sid 0 stable 0 testing 0 unstable 0 > > Hm, is this right? This comes from counting lines that match > > debian/dists/${DIST}/tahoe/binary-${ARCH}.*APT > > in the access.log. > > Regards, > > Zooko > _______________________________________________ > tahoe-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://allmydata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev >
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://allmydata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
