On Wed, 2009-07-29 16:10:26 -0600, Zooko O'Whielacronx <[email protected]> wrote: > Tahoe-LAFS sounds like a good match for your needs except for the > hidden stone of the FUSE interface being incomplete. It doesn't even > attempt to implement writes, and I don't know how will it works for > reads. It does have nice tests, so anybody who wanted to fix it would > get a nice head-start in that department by already having tests. > > Everyone who uses Tahoe-LAFS so far uses either the command-line > interface (CLI) or the RESTful web API (WAPI) or the web user > interface (WUI).
I haven't dived into accessing Tahoe-LAFS through my OS's native VFS,
but my current reading is that there are a number of native FUSE
implementations for Tahoe. Additional to that, the ssh/sftp stuff
*might* be nearly working. It is worth a test? ISTR that somebody
tried that half a year ago and basically found only quite simple
buglets that hindered it to work...
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [email protected] +49-172-7608481
Signature of: http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html
the second :
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://allmydata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
