On Sunday,2009-08-02, at 4:46 , Humberto Ortiz-Zuazaga wrote: > 32MB RAM in the device. It has a hard time compiling the > prerequisites for tahoe. Plus it's an ARM processor, so it didn't > work right.
The current version works right on ARM. I guess 32 MiB RAM might be too little, based on my experiment which showed 54 MiB of RAM was needed to run a storage server (although that experiment was on an x86 laptop -- maybe it requires less RAM on the Debian armel architecture). Certainly Tahoe-LAFS worked fine on Zandr's 128-MiB ARM NAS box for a while, but then that box broke and is currently unable to boot. There was a bug in Crypto++ v5.5 such that it computed AES incorrectly on ARM CPUs, but that has been fixed (either by upgrading to Crypto++ v5.6.0 or by building pycryptopp to use its own embedded copy of Crypto++). After that was fixed, the unit tests passed on Zandr's box and I used Zandr's box as my web gateway to upload and downloading files and view directories. François Deppierraz also contributed an ARM-based system to serve as a Tahoe-LAFS buildbot. Regards, Zooko _______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://allmydata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
