Hi Shawn, Shawn Willden wrote:
> The first observation is that when uploading small files it is very hard to > keep the upstream pipe full, regardless of my configuration. My upstream > connection is only about 400 kbps, but I can't sustain any more than about > 200 kbps usage regardless of whether I'm using a local node that goes through > a helper, direct to the helper, or a local node without the helper. Of > course, not using the helper produces the worst effective throughput, because > the uploaded data volume stays about the same, but the data is FEC-expanded. This is probably because Tahoe doesn't use a windowing protocol which makes it especially sensitive to the latency between nodes. You should have a look at Brian's description in bug #397. François http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe/ticket/397 _______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://allmydata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
