Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote: > > Unless someone raises some major issue against it, let's settle on > using HKDF (with extraction step using SHA-2-512 truncated to 256 bits > and expand step using SHA-2-256) for key-derivation functions in > future versions of Tahoe-LAFS.
Yay! I'm up for anything which is easy to specify, reasonably well trusted, and actually gets implemented :-). eagerly awaiting ECDSA, -Brian _______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://allmydata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
