Kevan Carstensen wrote:
> On 10/13/09 6:23 AM Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn <[email protected]> wrote:
>> What do you think -- is this measure of "health" a good enough
>> measure for the purposes of ticket #778?
>
> I think that your intuition of health is also covered by the current
> design of #778 -- that is, a mechanism that doesn't declare an upload
> successful unless
>
> 1. Shares from the file went to at least h peers, and
> 2. Any k of the h peers are sufficient to reconstruct the file.
Sorry to nitpick, but there's an ambiguity here: any k of *which* h peers?
Or do you mean:
2. Any k of the peers to which shares went are sufficient to
reconstruct the file.
?
--
David-Sarah Hopwood ⚥ http://davidsarah.livejournal.com
_______________________________________________
tahoe-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://allmydata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
