On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 06:20:07PM +0100, Stefan Xenon wrote: > A) increase the key length (e.g. AES-265)
I think that would make matters worse. AFAIK, AES-128 is considered to be *stronger* than AES-256 these days. A somewhat recent summary that I found: http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/07/another_new_aes.html > or allow the choice between > more algorithms and key lengths in general (user configured). Difficult; the caps/urls are getting pretty long already how would you encode this while not making them unmanageable? Also, client support becomes a non-trivial issue. -- Sam http://samason.me.uk/ _______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://allmydata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
