On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Shawn Willden <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Friday 18 December 2009 08:00:24 am Jody Harris wrote: > > I'm just desperately brainstorming here. My dreams of my tahoe-lafs grid > > are still smoldering in the heap that is left after the realization of > the > > problems introduced by non-publics IPs. > > NAT and the associated loss of the original peer-based structure of the > Internet has done immeasureable damage to Internet innovation. Asymmetric > network connections and ISP terms of service that restrict home "consumers" > from running "servers" have also done some damage, but we can mostly deal > with the former and just ignore the latter. NAT, on the other hand, is a > killer. > > IPv6 is our best hope, but adoption is agonizingly slow. Comcast has > announced that their network will provide IPv6 to all subscribers in the > next > two years; hopefully that will catalyze other ISPs to follow suit, and home > router manufacturers to properly configure their v6 stacks. But at best > we're probably 5 years from realistically being able to expect every home > user to just have a v6 connection. At best. > > Shawn. > Am I to understand this to mean that resolving this issue is not a priority for the tahoe development team? ---- - Think carefully. - Contra mundum - "Against the world" (St. Athanasius) - Credo ut intelliga - "I believe that I may know" (St. Augustin of Hippo)
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://allmydata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
