Hello, Jody Harris <imha...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Brian Warner <war...@lothar.com> wrote: > >> Jody Harris wrote: >> > I asked a question about forking Twisted for the short term. There was >> > no response to that. Either, "that's a good idea with obvious >> > consequences.....," or "That's stupid because....." >> >> Eh, I think mostly it's just infeasible. It would take a lot of time and >> work for a hypothetical fork to become as well tested, packaged, and >> distributed as the mainline Twisted is, and then it would require a lot >> of work to keep it from falling out-of-date. I believe it would be >> faster to get the necessary patch accepted into mainline. >> >> The next step towards that is to write a unit test for the patch. >> http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/3462 is the place to submit such a >> patch. >> >> Well, that certainly wreaks.... > > So, Tahoe-LAFS has broken usability pending a patch that another software > team is reluctant to code a test for.... FWIW I also think that fixing the (S)FTP situation may significantly improve user experience. Thanks, Ludo’. _______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list tahoe-dev@allmydata.org http://allmydata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
