Kevan Carstensen wrote: > At 2010-03-10 23:27 (+0000), David-Sarah Hopwood wrote: > >> That it isn't true for mutable files is, as far as I know, just a temporary >> limitation of the current mutable download/upload code (which does work in >> terms of segments, but hasn't been optimized to reduce its memory usage by >> doing so). > > This is true in the sense that the entire mutable file is treated as one > segment, AFAIK. Is that what you meant?
In the sense that the storage format and the 'mutable retrieve' code still works in terms of arbitrary-length segments (as far as I can tell), but the 'mutable publish' code happens to choose the segment size so that there is only one segment. -- David-Sarah Hopwood ⚥ http://davidsarah.livejournal.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://allmydata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
