On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Greg Troxel <[email protected]> wrote: > > and seq11 has 2 shares and seq12 8. So > > a) do people think this is really unhealthy?
This definition of "healthy" is too strict, IMHO. See related issue in immutable files: http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/614# redefine "Healthy" to be "Happy" for checker/verifier/repairer Hm, actually that ticket is not *specifically* about immutable files. Would you please comment on that ticket and paste in your notes from your message? > b) will --repair purge the 2 seq11 shares, and leave the seq12 alone > (assume it could find all 10 shares of 12 for this question)? > > > if not, how can --repair ever make it healthy? What happens when you try to repair that file? There is a related issue about the case that would happen if there were 3 seq11 shares instead of 2: http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/1004# how to fix 'multiple versions are recoverable'? Regards, Zooko _______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
