James A. Donald wrote: > On 2010-10-18 3:32 PM, Brian Warner wrote: >> - darcs is slow, hard to publish branches, hard to use local >> branches, hard to rewrite history before publishing, does not >> provide useful short secure versionids, is not widely available, is >> hard to build, has no good hosting services, has poor frontend/GUI >> support. Trac integration is massively inefficient, causing 500 >> Internal Server Errors and timeouts when things like 'darcs >> annotate' are being run. > > Darcs is written in the obscure boutique language Haskel. [snip]
Criticisms of Haskell [note spelling] are off-topic for this list. FWIW, I don't agree with your criticisms and I don't think they have much to do with any flaws of darcs. -- David-Sarah Hopwood ⚥ http://davidsarah.livejournal.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
