On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Nathan Eisenberg <[email protected]>wrote:
> > Even with 40 machines, you shouldn't run into any issues with > > scalability from a performance perspective. The commercial allmydata > > site had far more than that. > > You know, thinking about this - why should directories not be K=1, > M=$numservers? This would seem to be very roughly akin to a distributed > MFT? Surely this data doesn't consume a significant amount of storage? > Or at least be able to choose different parameters (presumably with greater redundancy) for dirnodes. I agree. -- Shawn
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
