On 2010-12-19 18:00, Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Ted Rolle Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: >> Would sudo apt-get install tahoe-lafs be a suitable solution? This installs >> v1.6.1. >> Is there a compelling reason to work out the 1.8.1 installation? >> Of course, I'd like to be at 1.8.1, but 1.6.1 may get me up and running. > > You can see what changed between 1.6.1 and 1.8.1 in the NEWS file: > > http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/browser/trunk/NEWS > > Assuming that you don't really require any of the new features then > sure, you can use 1.6.1.
... provided that the http_proxy and HTTP_PROXY variables are not set, to avoid the security bug that was fixed in 1.8.1. > Any really major problems that we discover that could allow your > confidentiality or data-integrity to be compromised or could allow > your data to be destroyed get documented in the "known issues" file: > > http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/browser/trunk/docs/known_issues.rst Actually that only documents security issues that are unfixed in trunk. -- David-Sarah Hopwood ⚥ http://davidsarah.livejournal.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
