On 2011-01-08 22:50, tahoe-lafs wrote: > #993: refactor download interfaces to treat immutable files and mutable > versions > more uniformly > > Comment (by kevan): > > An implementation of this ticket (including the interface) is in #393, so > I don't think there's anything to apply here. I'll remove review-needed. > I'm tempted to say that #993 could be marked as a duplicate of #393, but > it might be useful to be able to discuss the interface independently of > #393 as a whole, which is fairly long and involves other issues. > > (Maybe we should make a trac keyword that says that a ticket is in > particular need of design feedback or review but doesn't involve any code > changes. Then 'review-needed' could be used only for code changes needing > a review before they can be committed, and the other keyword could be used > for tickets like #993, which don't have a patch that we'd want to apply > but could benefit from other perspectives.)
I suggest 'design-review-needed', and 'design-reviewed' when done. (This will be included in the existing review-needed query on the ViewTickets page, because keyword queries match substrings.) -- David-Sarah Hopwood ⚥ http://davidsarah.livejournal.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
