On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Shawn Willden <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Ted Rolle Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The node was shut down ``Just because.'' If I understand tahoe-LAFS >> correctly, there is no possibility or reasonable suspicion to infer that the >> file was indeed stolen, based solely on the file's (unreadable) content; >> perhaps the party who put the file on tahoe-LAFS confessed to having done >> so. _This_ would constitute PC. >> > > There's some specific law which is relevant in this case, and it says what > Zooko said. > Oh, in case it wasn't obvious, everything I said was relative to US law. In the case of a gateway located in another country, or of a gateway in the US operated by a person in Austria... I have no idea what the law might be. -- Shawn
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
