Josh Wilcox <[email protected]> writes:

>   "Tahoe" is, after all, 'just' an implementation so I think the
> future-proofed logo is the one that emphasizes LAFS.

Interesting - i never realized that.

Does that mean we'll be seeing on-the-wire protocol specs  and
discussing those separate from the code :-) ?

Attachment: pgp7zMPAGzBLB.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
tahoe-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev

Reply via email to