On 18/01/2012 10:27 PM, "Greg Troxel" <[email protected]> wrote: > > That seems ok to me (I'm a longtime Scheme fan), but it's amusing to see > scheme as an extension language in a python program.
Yeah... See my comment to David-Sarah. :) > To make some progress with less work, I would suggest: > > write a design document for expressing locations, and for an upload > policy that seeks to get geographic diversity. (with the thought > that this will need redoing for the Grand Unified Upload Policy, but > that it's part of getting there rather than wasted) > > implement the above in Python, trying to keep it separated from other > code (with the thought that this is the first step towards a) being > useful and b) designing the (semantic) extension language interface > that will allow writing arbitrary policies) Sounds like a reasonable approach. My though of using something like JSON is that we don't need to have a set of common location rules, just some way of expressing and then getting attributes...but I think that's clear. Thanks for the feedback. Olaf
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
